Regional Livestock Bridge

An integrated regional livestock supply network connecting Yemen, Somalia, Somaliland, Ethiopia, Djibouti and Sudan with Gulf and regional markets

The Verified Bridge for Verified Livestock

Regional Livestock Bridge Market Intelligence

Livestock Market Report — August 2026

An expanded monthly analysis of commercial livestock enquiries recorded across the Regional Livestock Bridge network, supported by charts, analytical tables, a demand-corridor map and explanatory commentary for every section.

Reporting period: 1–31 August 2026Published: 13 September 2026Report ID: RLB-MR-2026-08
Methodology note: these figures represent commercial activity observed within the Regional Livestock Bridge network and are not official national import or export statistics.
33Purchase requests
20,925Estimated heads demanded
8Active markets
29Unique buyers
20 (60.6%)Urgent requests
7Execution requests
01

Executive summary

During August 2026, the Regional Livestock Bridge network recorded 33 commercial purchase requests representing an estimated 20,925 head across eight buyer markets. Twenty-nine unique buyers or organizations were identified, while 20 requests were classified as urgent, equal to 60.6% of all purchase requests. This high urgency rate means supplier verification, price confirmation and logistics matching must happen quickly if enquiries are to convert into transactions.

Sheep and rams accounted for 74.5% of estimated volume, followed by goats at 18.3%, camels at 6.0% and cattle at 1.2%. Small ruminants therefore drove most buyer activity during the month, while cattle and camels represented fewer but potentially higher-value and more operationally complex opportunities.

By volume, Libya ranked first because of one 10,000-head enquiry, while Saudi Arabia and Yemen each generated 10 separate purchase requests. This distinction is important: a market with many repeat enquiries can be more commercially resilient than a market whose apparent size is created by one very large opportunity.

Somalia represented 83.5% of requested-origin volume. This reinforces the strategic value of supplier depth, collection capacity, quarantine coordination and shipping options on Somali routes, while Ethiopia and Yemen remain important diversification origins for goats, cattle and locally preferred sheep.

02

Demand by buyer market

Markets by demand volume

Libya10,000 · 1 req
Saudi Arabia3,650 · 10 req
Somalia3,100 · 2 req
United Arab Emirates2,700 · 4 req
Yemen667 · 10 req
Kenya500 · 1 req
Oman300 · 4 req
Ethiopia8 · 1 req

Market

MarketEstimated headsRequestsVolume share
Libya10,000147.8%
Saudi Arabia3,6501017.4%
Somalia3,100214.8%
United Arab Emirates2,700412.9%
Yemen667103.2%
Kenya50012.4%
Oman30041.4%
Ethiopia810.0%

August demand was highly concentrated by volume. Libya represented about 47.8% of estimated heads, followed by Saudi Arabia at 17.4%, Somalia at 14.8% and the UAE at 12.9%. The top three markets together accounted for approximately 80.0% of recorded volume.

The request count tells a different story. Saudi Arabia generated 10 requests averaging about 365 head each, while Libya generated only one request. Yemen also generated 10 requests but averaged roughly 67 head. This reveals two buyer patterns: occasional very-large-volume opportunities and recurring smaller or mid-sized commercial enquiries.

These patterns require different sales approaches. Large-volume opportunities need firm verification of aggregation capacity, financing and vessel or freight availability before commitment, while high-frequency markets benefit from standard quotations, ready supplier lists and repeatable delivery routes.

03

Demand by livestock category

Demand mix by livestock category

Sheep / Rams74.5%
Goats18.3%
Camels6.0%
Cattle1.2%
CategoryEstimated headsRequestsShare
Sheep / Rams15,5921574.5%
Goats3,8251018.3%
Camels1,25856.0%
Cattle25031.2%

Estimated sheep and ram demand reached 15,592 head across 15 requests. Goats followed with 3,825 head across 10 requests, while camels totaled 1,258 head and cattle 250 head.

Weight specifications show strong demand for medium sheep around the 20–28 kg range, while goat demand spans light, medium and heavy categories depending on whether buyers intend to fatten, resell or slaughter. Supplier records should therefore be indexed by available weight as well as breed.

Cattle volumes were smaller, but requested weights ranged from about 120 kg to 400 kg, reflecting feedlot and trading use cases rather than only immediate slaughter. Cattle should therefore be managed as a distinct commercial stream with dedicated suppliers, specifications and transport planning.

04

Most requested origins

Origins by demand volume

Somalia17,480 · 83.5%
Yemen1,687 · 8.1%
Ethiopia1,658 · 7.9%
Djibouti100 · 0.5%
CategoryEstimated headsRequestsShare
Somalia17,4801483.5%
Yemen1,687108.1%
Ethiopia1,65887.9%
Djibouti10010.5%

Somali-origin livestock represented 17,480 head across 14 requests, or 83.5% of recorded volume. Yemen followed with 1,687 head, Ethiopia with 1,658 head and Djibouti with 100 head.

The Somali concentration is driven mainly by large sheep requirements, supported by goat and camel demand. This creates an opportunity for better scale economics in aggregation, quarantine and sea freight where compatible orders can be grouped.

Ethiopia and Yemen remain strategically important to reduce single-origin exposure, especially when veterinary restrictions, freight costs or seasonality affect one supply base. RLB should maintain ready alternative origins for each major livestock category.

05

Payment terms and urgency

Payment method distribution

30/7021 · 63.6%
Other7 · 21.2%
Letter of Credit (L/C)3 · 9.1%
Transparent Management2 · 6.1%

Purchase urgency

Urgent20 · 60.6%
Medium13 · 39.4%
Payment methodRequestsShare
30/702163.6%
Other721.2%
Letter of Credit (L/C)39.1%
Transparent Management26.1%

The 30/70 structure was selected in 21 of 33 requests, or 63.6%. Three requests specified L/C, two selected the Transparent Management Program and seven used other arrangements. The pattern shows a strong preference for staged payment structures that balance buyer commitment and supplier risk.

Twenty requests were urgent and 13 had a medium timeline. With 60.6% of requests urgent, a large share of buyers appear to be seeking near-term execution rather than general market information. CRM prioritization should therefore connect urgency with supplier readiness, confirmed quantity, documentation and likely shipment timing.

Commercially, a request with meaningful volume, clear payment terms and high urgency should receive greater follow-up priority than a very large enquiry that lacks a credible execution path.

06

Purchase purpose and commercial use

Purchase purposes

15Trading / Resale
12Fattening
10Breeding
5Direct slaughter

Trading and resale appeared in 15 requests, fattening in 12, breeding in 10 and direct slaughter in five. Buyers may select more than one purpose, so these counts are incidence measures rather than components of a 100% total.

The intended use materially changes the ideal animal specification. Feedlot cattle or small ruminants need an efficient entry weight and growth potential, while direct-slaughter buyers focus more heavily on finished weight, meat yield and delivery speed. Breeding demand adds age, sex and productive-trait requirements.

Supplier databases should therefore include intended-use suitability for each available lot, not only species, breed and weight.

07

Monthly demand trend

Estimated monthly demand volume

05,23110,46215,69320,9256,800Apr 20265 req5,122May 202610 req8,510Jun 202629 req4,260Jul 202613 req20,925Aug 202633 req
1,5501–7 Aug · 4 req
6508–14 Aug · 3 req
3,79015–21 Aug · 9 req
14,93522–31 Aug · 17 req
MonthPurchase requestsEstimated heads
Apr 202656,800
May 2026105,122
Jun 2026298,510
Jul 2026134,260
Aug 20263320,925

Estimated demand increased to 20,925 head in August from 4,260 in July, making August the highest-volume month in the current series. Purchase requests also increased to 33 from 13 in July.

Within August, 71.4% of estimated heads were recorded between 22 and 31 August, when 14,935 head were logged across 17 requests. This indicates a strong late-month acceleration, although the figure is also influenced by the single 10,000-head Libya enquiry.

Several additional months of data are needed before treating this as a stable seasonal pattern. As the series expands, RLB can build monthly indices covering volume, buyer count, urgency and average order size by market.

08

Delivery points and ports

Most requested delivery points

Jeddah Islamic Port9 req
Mocha Port5 req
Sohar Port4 req
Other / Not specified7 req
Jazan Port2 req
Mukalla Port2 req
Jebel Ali1 req
Aden1 req
Hodeidah1 req
Shinile1 req
Delivery pointRequestsShare of requests
Jeddah Islamic Port927.3%
Mocha Port515.2%
Sohar Port412.1%
Other / Not specified721.2%
Jazan Port26.1%
Mukalla Port26.1%
Jebel Ali13.0%
Aden13.0%
Hodeidah13.0%
Shinile13.0%

Jeddah Islamic Port was the most frequently requested delivery point with nine requests, followed by Mocha Port with five and Sohar Port with four. Jazan, Mukalla, Jebel Ali, Aden, Hodeidah and other locations also appeared.

Repeated demand for Jeddah, Sohar and Mocha supports building standard landed-cost templates for these routes. Each template should separate livestock cost, inland transport, quarantine and testing, export charges, sea freight, port charges and final inland delivery where applicable.

Large or unusual corridors, such as the Libya opportunity, should be priced independently because livestock-vessel availability, voyage duration, feed and water requirements and discharge arrangements can materially change the economics.

09

Demand corridor map

Observed demand corridors

LibyaSaudi ArabiaUnited Arab EmiratesOmanYemenDjiboutiEthiopiaSomaliaKenyaSchematic view — not to geographic scale
Requested originBuyer marketHeadsRequests
SomaliaLibya10,0001
SomaliaSomalia3,1002
SomaliaUnited Arab Emirates2,5003
YemenSaudi Arabia1,3003
SomaliaSaudi Arabia1,1503
EthiopiaSaudi Arabia1,1003
SomaliaKenya5001
YemenYemen3877
EthiopiaYemen2502
SomaliaOman2003
EthiopiaUnited Arab Emirates2001
EthiopiaOman1001
DjiboutiSaudi Arabia1001
SomaliaYemen301
EthiopiaEthiopia81

The schematic map below shows the principal demand corridors observed in August using the buyer-requested origin and buyer market. Line thickness approximates recorded head volume, while the accompanying table provides the numeric values.

The largest corridor was Somalia → Libya at 10,000 head, followed by Somalia → Somalia at 3,100 head and Somalia → UAE at 2,500 head. Saudi Arabia received demand from several requested origins, including Yemen, Somalia, Ethiopia and Djibouti, illustrating its role as a multi-origin buyer market.

This is a demand-analysis map, not a vessel-routing map. The final operational route for any shipment depends on approved ports, permits, animal-health conditions and transport availability at the time of execution.

10

Market signals and recommendations

1

Expand verified Somali supplier depth: the requested-origin concentration is high enough to justify stronger sourcing, aggregation and quarantine capacity.

2

Treat Saudi Arabia as a recurring core market: 10 separate requests make it strategically important even though it did not lead total volume.

3

Monitor the late-August acceleration: determine whether the higher enquiry rate continues into September or was driven by exceptional opportunities.

4

Use 30/70 as a common commercial baseline where suitable, while retaining L/C and Transparent Management for transactions that require different risk structures.

5

Keep sheep and goats as the fast-turnover sourcing core, while managing cattle and camels through more specialized procurement and logistics tracks.

11

Methodology and data limitations

This report is based on purchase requests and commercial enquiries recorded through the Regional Livestock Bridge network during the stated period. Sell-side submissions are excluded from core demand indicators, and market, livestock, origin, payment and quantity fields are standardized for analysis.

Where a quantity is entered as a range, the analytical dataset uses a normalized midpoint estimate according to the cleaning rules. Quantities that cannot be interpreted safely are not invented. A single enquiry may include multiple purchase purposes, so purpose counts can exceed the number of requests.

These figures do not represent the total market size of any country and should not be used as official import or export statistics. Their primary value is to measure activity and trends within the RLB network and support faster, data-informed decisions by buyers, suppliers and management.

Download full PDF report

Methodology note: these figures represent commercial activity observed within the Regional Livestock Bridge network and are not official national import or export statistics.

Download full PDF report
12

Monthly report archive

RLB-MR-2026-08

August 2026

Reporting period: 1–31 August 2026
Open report